Tools
Tools
Zagefka, H., Binder, J. 
ORCID: 0000-0002-1083-7109, Brown, R. and Hancock, L.,
2013.
Who is to blame? The relationship between ingroup identification and relative deprivation is moderated by ingroup attributions.
Social Psychology, 44 (6), pp. 398-407.
ISSN 1864-9335
|
Text
211622_PubSub713_Binder.pdf Download (162kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Contradictory evidence can be found in the literature about whether ingroup identification and perceived relative deprivation are positively or negatively related. Indeed, theoretical arguments can be made for both effects. It was proposed that the contradictory findings can be explained by considering a hitherto unstudied moderator: The extent to which deprivation is attributed to the ingroup. It was hypothesised that identification would only have a negative impact on deprivation, and that deprivation would only have a negative impact on identification, if ingroup attributions are high. To test this, attributions to the ingroup were experimentally manipulated among British student participants (N = 189) who were asked about their perceived deprivation vis-à-vis German students, yield ing support for the hypotheses.
| Item Type: | Journal article | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Publication Title: | Social Psychology | ||||
| Creators: | Zagefka, H., Binder, J., Brown, R. and Hancock, L. | ||||
| Publisher: | Hogrefe Publishing | ||||
| Date: | 2013 | ||||
| Volume: | 44 | ||||
| Number: | 6 | ||||
| ISSN: | 1864-9335 | ||||
| Identifiers: |
|
||||
| Rights: | Copyright © 2013 Hogrefe Publishing | ||||
| Divisions: | Schools > School of Social Sciences | ||||
| Record created by: | EPrints Services | ||||
| Date Added: | 09 Oct 2015 10:32 | ||||
| Last Modified: | 20 Aug 2020 15:14 | ||||
| URI: | https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/14317 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit View |
Views
Views per month over past year
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
