Teasing apart retrieval and encoding interference in the processing of anaphors

Jäger, L.A., Benz, L., Roeser, J., Dillon, B.W. and Vasishth, S., 2015. Teasing apart retrieval and encoding interference in the processing of anaphors. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. ISSN 1664-1078

[img]
Preview
Text
220395_2525.pdf

Download (305kB) | Preview

Abstract

Two classes of account have been proposed to explain the memory processes subserving the processing of reflexive-antecedent dependencies. Structure-based accounts assume that the retrieval of the antecedent is guided by syntactic tree-configurational information without considering other kinds of information such as gender marking in the case of English reflexives. By contrast, unconstrained cue-based retrieval assumes that all available information is used for retrieving the antecedent. Similarity-based interference effects from structurally illicit distractors which match a non-structural retrieval cue have been interpreted as evidence favoring the unconstrained cue-based retrieval account since cue-based retrieval interference from structurally illicit distractors is incompatible with the structure-based account.

Item Type: Journal article
Publication Title: Frontiers in Psychology
Creators: Jäger, L.A., Benz, L., Roeser, J., Dillon, B.W. and Vasishth, S.
Publisher: Frontiers
Place of Publication: Lausanne, Switzerland
Date: 2015
Volume: 6
ISSN: 1664-1078
Identifiers:
NumberType
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00506DOI
Divisions: Schools > School of Social Sciences
Depositing User: EPrints Services
Date Added: 09 Oct 2015 10:58
Last Modified: 23 Aug 2016 09:13
URI: http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/20969

Actions (login required)

Edit View Edit View

Views

Views per month over past year

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year