Section 35A and quorum requirements: confusion reigns

WALTERS, A., 2002. Section 35A and quorum requirements: confusion reigns. Company Lawyer, 23 (11), pp. 325-326. ISSN 0144-1027

[img]
Preview
Text
187343_4987 Walters Publisher.pdf

Download (27kB) | Preview

Abstract

Engaged as it is in the Herculean task of drafting the Companies Bill, the DTI would be well advised to consider the implications of Smith v. Henniker-Major & Co. This case has spawned four judgments in the higher courts, each giving a different reading to section 35A of the Companies Act 1985, leaving the law in a highly unsatisfactory state.

Item Type: Journal article
Publication Title: Company Lawyer
Creators: Walters, A.
Publisher: Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters
Place of Publication: London
Date: 2002
Volume: 23
Number: 11
ISSN: 0144-1027
Rights: Permission is for Nottingham Trent University’s Institutional Repository only. Any further use (including storage, transmission or reproduction by electronic means) shall be the subject of a separate application for permission.
Divisions: Schools > Nottingham Law School
Depositing User: EPrints Services
Date Added: 09 Oct 2015 09:46
Last Modified: 19 Oct 2015 14:23
URI: http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/2583

Actions (login required)

Edit View Edit View

Views

Views per month over past year

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year