Tools
Tools
Walters, A. 
ORCID: 0000-0002-5854-4655,
2002.
Section 35A and quorum requirements: confusion reigns.
Company Lawyer, 23 (11), pp. 325-326.
ISSN 0144-1027
|
Text
187343_4987 Walters Publisher.pdf Download (27kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Engaged as it is in the Herculean task of drafting the Companies Bill, the DTI would be well advised to consider the implications of Smith v. Henniker-Major & Co. This case has spawned four judgments in the higher courts, each giving a different reading to section 35A of the Companies Act 1985, leaving the law in a highly unsatisfactory state.
| Item Type: | Journal article |
|---|---|
| Publication Title: | Company Lawyer |
| Creators: | Walters, A. |
| Publisher: | Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters |
| Place of Publication: | London |
| Date: | 2002 |
| Volume: | 23 |
| Number: | 11 |
| ISSN: | 0144-1027 |
| Rights: | Permission is for Nottingham Trent University’s Institutional Repository only. Any further use (including storage, transmission or reproduction by electronic means) shall be the subject of a separate application for permission. |
| Divisions: | Schools > Nottingham Law School |
| Record created by: | EPrints Services |
| Date Added: | 09 Oct 2015 09:46 |
| Last Modified: | 09 Jun 2017 13:10 |
| URI: | https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/2583 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit View |
Views
Views per month over past year
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
