Decision making, cognitive distortions and emotional distress: a comparison between pathological gamblers and healthy controls

Tools

Ciccarelli, M., Griffiths, M.D. ORCID: 0000-0001-8880-6524, Nigro, G. and Cosenza, M., 2017. Decision making, cognitive distortions and emotional distress: a comparison between pathological gamblers and healthy controls. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 54, pp. 204-210. ISSN 0005-7916

Preview

Text
PubSub6182_Griffiths.pdf - Post-print
Download (696kB) | Preview

Official URL: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.08.012

Abstract

Background and objectives: The etiology of problem gambling is multifaceted and complex. Among others factors, poor decision making, cognitive distortions (i.e., irrational beliefs about gambling), and emotional factors (e.g., negative mood states) appear to be among the most important factors in the development and maintenance of problem gambling. Although empirical evidence has suggested that cognitive distortions facilitate gambling and negative emotions are associated with gambling, the interplay between cognitive distortions, emotional states, and decision making in gambling remains unexplored. Methods: Pathological gamblers (N=54) and healthy controls (N=54) completed the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS), the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS), and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21). Results: Compared to healthy controls, pathological gamblers showed poorer decision making and reported higher scores on measures assessing cognitive distortions and emotional distress. All measures were positively associated with gambling severity. A significant negative correlation between decision making and cognitive distortions was also observed. No associations were found between poor decision making and emotional distress. Logistic regressi on analysis indicated that cognitive distortions, emotional distress, and poor decision making were significant predictors of problem gambling. Limitations: The use of self-report measures and the absence of female participants limit the generalizability of the reported findings. Conclusions: The present study is the first to demonstrate the mutual influence between irrational beliefs and poor decision making, as well as the role of cognitive bias, emotional distress, and poor decision making in gambling disorder.

Item Type:

Journal article

Publication Title:

Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Creators:

Ciccarelli, M., Griffiths, M.D., Nigro, G. and Cosenza, M.

Publisher:

Elsevier

Date:

March 2017

Volume:

ISSN: