Should voluntary "self-exclusion" by gamblers be used as a proxy measure for problem gambling?

Auer, M. and Griffiths, M.D. ORCID: 0000-0001-8880-6524, 2016. Should voluntary "self-exclusion" by gamblers be used as a proxy measure for problem gambling? MOJ Addiction Medicine & Therapy, 2 (2), 00019. ISSN 2333-665X

[img]
Preview
Text
PubSub7185_Griffiths.pdf - Published version

Download (371kB) | Preview

Abstract

This brief paper critically addresses a recent approach by researchers that use voluntary self-exclusion (VSE) by gamblers as a proxy measure for problem gambling. By using tracking data from online gamblers or data from player cards, such research derives typical behavioral patterns of past voluntary self-excluders and uses their data to predict and identify problem gamblers. We argue that this approach is flawed and is unlikely to help in developing harm-minimization measures. We argue that using personalized feedback is a much better approach
to the prevention of problem gambling than using data from those that self-exclude from gambling.

Item Type: Journal article
Alternative Title: Should voluntary self-exclusion by gamblers be used as a proxy measure for problem gambling? [working title]
Publication Title: MOJ Addiction Medicine & Therapy
Creators: Auer, M. and Griffiths, M.D.
Publisher: MedCrave
Date: 2016
Volume: 2
Number: 2
ISSN: 2333-665X
Identifiers:
NumberType
10.15406/mojamt.2016.02.00019DOI
Rights: ©2016 Griffiths et al. Open access journal.
Divisions: Schools > School of Social Sciences
Record created by: Jonathan Gallacher
Date Added: 15 Dec 2016 14:13
Last Modified: 11 Oct 2017 14:58
URI: https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/29392

Actions (login required)

Edit View Edit View

Views

Views per month over past year

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year