Favouritism: exploring the 'uncontrolled' spaces of the leadership experience

Palermo, O.A. ORCID: 0000-0002-6325-8055, Carnaz, A.C. and Duarte, H., 2018. Favouritism: exploring the 'uncontrolled' spaces of the leadership experience. Leadership. ISSN 1742-7150

[img]
Preview
Text
9602_Palermo.pdf - Post-print

Download (488kB) | Preview

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that a focus on favouritism magnifies a central ethical ambiguity in leadership, both conceptually and in practice. The social process of favouritism can even go unnoticed, or misrecognised if it does not manifest in a form in which it can be either included or excluded from what is (collectively interpreted as) leadership. The leadership literature presents a tension between what is an embodied and relational account of the ethical, on the one hand, and a more dispassionate organisational ‘justice’ emphasis, on the other hand. We conducted 23 semi-structured interviews in eight consultancy companies, four multinationals and four internationals. There were ethical issues at play in the way interviewees thought about favouritism in leadership episodes. This emerged in the fact that they were concerned with visibility and conduct before engaging in favouritism. Our findings illustrate a bricolage of ethical justifications for favouritism, namely utilitarian, justice, and relational. Such findings suggest the ethical ambiguity that lies at the heart of leadership as a concept and a practice.

Item Type: Journal article
Publication Title: Leadership
Creators: Palermo, O.A., Carnaz, A.C. and Duarte, H.
Publisher: Sage
Date: 1 February 2018
ISSN: 1742-7150
Identifiers:
NumberType
10.1177/1742715017749190DOI
Divisions: Schools > Nottingham Business School
Depositing User: Jonathan Gallacher
Date Added: 20 Feb 2018 15:26
Last Modified: 20 Feb 2018 15:26
URI: http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/32759

Actions (login required)

Edit View Edit View

Views

Views per month over past year

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year