Legitimizing military action through 'rape-as-a-weapon' discourse in Libya: critical feminist analysis

Tools

Kolmasova, S. and Krulisova, K. ORCID: 0000-0001-8065-188X, 2018. Legitimizing military action through 'rape-as-a-weapon' discourse in Libya: critical feminist analysis. Politics & Gender. ISSN 1743-923X

Preview

Text
11427_Krulisova.pdf - Post-print
Download (1MB) | Preview

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X18000326

Abstract

Contemporary discourse on sexual(ized) violence in armed conflicts represents a powerful source for legitimization of highly controversial military interventions. Recent outburst of gender-responsive security studies calls for enhanced protection of women and girls from widespread and systematic sexual(ized) violence. Yet, military operations reproduce the Western masculine hegemony rather than providing inclusive and apolitical assistance to victims of sexual assaults. The article aims to critically assess discourse on sexual violence in a case of military intervention initiated under the rubric of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P), namely Libya. The case study indicates a set of discursive strategies exercised by Western political representatives, NGOs and even more expressively by the media to legitimize military campaign. Typically, sexual(ized) violence is presented as a weapon of war, used by one of the conflicting parties without an adequate response of the state. This is followed by urgent calls for international action, willingly carried out by Western powers. The simplified narrative of civilized protectors vs. savage aggressors must be challenged as it exploits the problem of sexual(ized) violence in order to legitimize politically motivated actions.

Item Type:

Journal article

Publication Title:

Politics & Gender

Creators:

Kolmasova, S. and Krulisova, K.

Publisher:

Cambridge University Press for The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Date:

26 July 2018

ISSN:

1743-923X