Asset-based strategies for capturing value in the service economy

Wirtz, J. and Ehret, M. ORCID: 0000-0002-2478-8889, 2018. Asset-based strategies for capturing value in the service economy. In: P.P. Maglio, C.A. Kieliszewski, J.C. Spohrer, K. Lyons, L. Patricio and Y. Sawatani, eds., Handbook of service science. Volume II. Service science: research and innovations in the service economy . Cham, Switzerland: Springer International. ISBN 9783319985114 (Forthcoming)

[img] Text
11779_Ehret.pdf - Post-print
Full-text access embargoed until 22 October 2020.

Download (343kB)

Abstract

In advanced service economies, almost any activity, skill, and asset can be bought on competitive markets, making it increasingly difficult to build competitive advantage on any of those inputs. Therefore, firms have to carefully decide what to own in order to capture value. That is, firms have to explore what types of assets can add value to their customers and at the same time are difficult or illegal to copy by competition. We examined this question and identified asset categories that potentially allow a firm to appropriate value. They are (1) resource-based assets (e.g., proprietary equipment and systems, manufacturing-related intellectual property (IP), and social capital with employees); (2) platform-based assets (e.g., physical and intellectual platform assets, and critical mass and volume-based advantages,); and (3) market-based assets (e.g., brands and related brand equity, physical and virtual points-of-sale, access to physical and virtual distribution networks, and customer information and loyalty programs). Furthermore, we propose that each of these three asset categories can take the form of three types of capital. They are (1) tangible capital (i.e., it has a physical manifestation such as equipment and physical points-of-sale); (2) intangible capital (i.e., it can be codified and legally protected such as patents and brands); and (3) social capital (i.e., it is embedded in people’s minds and cannot be legally protected such as trust, goodwill and engagement of employees, partners and customers). The three asset types and their three manifestations are integrated into a framework for an asset typology. For example, market-based assets can come in all three forms, that is in tangible (e.g., point-of-sale networks), intangible (e.g., brands), and social (e.g., customer equity) form. Finally, we identified four important organizational capabilities of asset integration that are independent of asset ownership but effectively link owned and outsources assets, capabilities, and processes to value creation and can also allow a firm to capture value. They are (1) business models for designing the architecture and “Gestalt” of value creation; (2) a customer-centric culture and a climate for service; (3) innovation capabilities, and (4) the effective management of an integrated web of processes and activities. We discuss the why and how of this asset typology and its implications for management, strategy, and research.

Item Type: Chapter in book
Creators: Wirtz, J. and Ehret, M.
Publisher: Springer International
Place of Publication: Cham, Switzerland
Date: 2018
ISSN: 1865-4924
Divisions: Schools > Nottingham Business School
Depositing User: Jonathan Gallacher
Date Added: 21 Aug 2018 10:47
Last Modified: 21 Aug 2018 10:48
URI: http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/34363

Actions (login required)

Edit View Edit View

Views

Views per month over past year

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year