Thresholds of damage for properties damaged by ground subsidence

Jackson, R., 2000. Thresholds of damage for properties damaged by ground subsidence. PhD, Nottingham Trent University.

[img]
Preview
Text
10183422.pdf - Published version

Download (31MB) | Preview

Abstract

This study has investigated thresholds of damage for privately owned low-rise residential properties damaged by ground subsidence or heave movement. The primary focus of the research objectives has been the uncertainties created by subsidence damage. The study investigates thresholds of damage that can be used to assess the remedial action necessary for low-rise residential properties damaged by ground subsidence or heave movement. After investigating thresholds of damage, the study subsequently considers the implications that thresholds of damage would create if applied in practice.

The research was carried out through the collection and analysis of 236 case study properties. Each case study represents a privately owned low-rise residential property that was thought to have been damaged by ground subsidence or heave movement. The research has considered properties damaged by subsidence or heave movement caused by leaking drains, clay subsoil shrinkage or expansion and subsidence caused by coal-mining. Case study information has been gathered from a variety of sources, using data collected by professionally qualified chartered engineers, surveyors or other specialists. In addition to these case studies, the research has employed semi-structured interviews in order to consider the implications that thresholds of damage would create if applied in practice.

The research found that the evaluation of visible damage is a highly subjective matter and that any thresholds based upon an assessment of visible damage are an unreliable method to consider whether or not a property requires substantive repairs. The most robust threshold of damage which is found to emerge was to evaluate whether or not the movement causing the damage in the property is long-term progressive. The consequences of implementing this threshold of damage have been investigated. It has been concluded that if this threshold of damage was adopted, it could lead to both reductions in payments necessary to repair subsidence or heave damage and it could also reduce some of the uncertainties associated with subsidence.

Item Type: Thesis
Creators: Jackson, R.
Date: 2000
ISBN: 9781369316230
Identifiers:
NumberType
PQ10183422Other
Divisions: Professional Services > Libraries and Learning Resources
Record created by: Linda Sullivan
Date Added: 25 Sep 2020 14:04
Last Modified: 23 Aug 2023 13:22
URI: https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/40951

Actions (login required)

Edit View Edit View

Views

Views per month over past year

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year