Using continuous sedation until death for cancer patients: a qualitative interview study of physicians' and nurses' practice in three European countries

Seymour, J., Rietjens, J., Bruinsma, S., Deliens, L., Sterckx, S., Mortier, F., Brown, J., Mathers, N., van der Heide, A., Addington-Hall, J., Anquinet, L., Brown, J. ORCID: 0000-0002-9489-1654, Bruinsma, S., Deliens, L., Mathers, N., Mortier, F., Payne, S., Raus, K., Rietjens, J., Seale, C., Seymour, J., Smithson, W.H., Sterckx, S., Janssens, R. and van der Heide, A., 2015. Using continuous sedation until death for cancer patients: a qualitative interview study of physicians' and nurses' practice in three European countries. Palliative Medicine, 29 (1), pp. 48-59. ISSN 0269-2163

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background: Extensive debate surrounds the practice of continuous sedation until death to control refractory symptoms in terminal cancer care. We examined reported practice of United Kingdom, Belgian and Dutch physicians and nurses.

Methods: Qualitative case studies using interviews.

Setting: Hospitals, the domestic home and hospices or palliative care units.

Participants: In all, 57 Physicians and 73 nurses involved in the care of 84 cancer patients.

Results: UK respondents reported a continuum of practice from the provision of low doses of sedatives to control terminal restlessness to rarely encountered deep sedation. In contrast, Belgian respondents predominantly described the use of deep sedation, emphasizing the importance of responding to the patient’s request. Dutch respondents emphasized making an official medical decision informed by the patient’s wish and establishing that a refractory symptom was present. Respondents employed rationales that showed different stances towards four key issues: the preservation of consciousness, concerns about the potential hastening of death, whether they perceived continuous sedation until death as an ‘alternative’ to euthanasia and whether they sought to follow guidelines or frameworks for practice.

Conclusion: This qualitative analysis suggests that there is systematic variation in end-of-life care sedation practice and its conceptualization in the United Kingdom, Belgium and the Netherlands.

Item Type: Journal article
Description: Created on behalf of the UNBIASED consortium.
Publication Title: Palliative Medicine
Creators: Seymour, J., Rietjens, J., Bruinsma, S., Deliens, L., Sterckx, S., Mortier, F., Brown, J., Mathers, N., van der Heide, A., Addington-Hall, J., Anquinet, L., Brown, J., Bruinsma, S., Deliens, L., Mathers, N., Mortier, F., Payne, S., Raus, K., Rietjens, J., Seale, C., Seymour, J., Smithson, W.H., Sterckx, S., Janssens, R. and van der Heide, A.
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: January 2015
Volume: 29
Number: 1
ISSN: 0269-2163
Identifiers:
NumberType
10.1177/0269216314543319DOI
1824218Other
Rights: © The Author(s) 2014.
Divisions: Schools > School of Social Sciences
Record created by: Linda Sullivan
Date Added: 24 Oct 2023 10:34
Last Modified: 24 Oct 2023 10:34
URI: https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/50104

Actions (login required)

Edit View Edit View

Views

Views per month over past year

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year