Tools
Tools
Cerella, A. 
ORCID: 0000-0002-6417-091X,
2024.
Power’s two bodies: a critique of Agamben’s theory of sovereignty.
Philosophy Today, 68 (1), pp. 71-89.
ISSN 0031-8256
|
Text
1865582_Cerella.pdf - Post-print Download (376kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article seeks to problematize Agamben’s interpretation of sovereignty in light of the “archaeological method” he uses in his Homo Sacer project. In contrast to Agamben’s exposition, which treats biopolitics as the original and ontological paradigm of Western politics, the essay discusses how, historically, sovereign power has been conceived as a “double body”—transcendent and immanent, sacred and sacrificial, absolute and perpetual—from whose tension conceptual and political metamorpho- ses of sovereignty arise. The first attribute of sovereignty—absoluteness, on which Agamben has often focused—should be seen as an ordering and essentially modern function of its second “body”: the perpetuity of power. The article illustrates, then, how the retrospective projections through which the Italian philosopher constructs his ontological reading of sovereignty depend on some logical and epistemological lacunae that characterize his “archaeological method,” which is based, essentially, on an arbitrary use of historical analogies.
| Item Type: | Journal article | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Publication Title: | Philosophy Today | ||||||
| Creators: | Cerella, A. | ||||||
| Publisher: | Philosophy Documentation Center | ||||||
| Date: | 2024 | ||||||
| Volume: | 68 | ||||||
| Number: | 1 | ||||||
| ISSN: | 0031-8256 | ||||||
| Identifiers: |
|
||||||
| Divisions: | Schools > School of Social Sciences | ||||||
| Record created by: | Jonathan Gallacher | ||||||
| Date Added: | 13 Mar 2024 09:37 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 13 Mar 2024 09:37 | ||||||
| URI: | https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/51063 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit View |
Views
Views per month over past year
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
