Self-reported deposits versus actual deposits in online gambling: an empirical study

Auer, M., Hopfgartner, N., Helic, D. and Griffiths, M.D. ORCID: 0000-0001-8880-6524, 2024. Self-reported deposits versus actual deposits in online gambling: an empirical study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 40 (2), pp. 619-637. ISSN 1050-5350

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

In recent years a number of studies have used objective gambling data from online gambling operators to study gambling behavior. A few of these studies have compared gamblers’ actual gambling behavior (using account-based tracking data) with their subjective gambling behavior (using responses from survey data). The present study extended previous studies by comparing self-reported money deposited with the actual amount of money deposited. The authors were given access to an anonymized secondary dataset of 1,516 online gamblers from a European online gambling operator. After removing those who had not deposited any money in the previous 30 days, the final sample size for analysis was 639 online gamblers. The results indicated that gamblers were able to estimate fairly accurately how much money they had deposited in the past 30 days. However, the higher the amount of money deposited, the more likely gamblers underestimated the actual amount of money deposited. With respect to age and gender, there were no significant differences between male and female gamblers in their estimation biases. However, a significant age difference was found between those who overestimated and underestimated their deposits, with younger gamblers tending to overestimate their deposits. Providing feedback as to whether the gamblers overestimated or underestimated their deposits did not lead to any additional significant changes in the amount of money deposited when considering the overall reduction in deposits after self-assessment. The implications of the findings are discussed.

Item Type: Journal article
Publication Title: Journal of Gambling Studies
Creators: Auer, M., Hopfgartner, N., Helic, D. and Griffiths, M.D.
Publisher: Springer
Date: June 2024
Volume: 40
Number: 2
ISSN: 1050-5350
Identifiers:
NumberType
10.1007/s10899-023-10230-1DOI
2183012Other
Rights: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Divisions: Schools > School of Social Sciences
Record created by: Jonathan Gallacher
Date Added: 30 Jul 2024 13:40
Last Modified: 30 Jul 2024 13:40
URI: https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/51845

Actions (login required)

Edit View Edit View

Views

Views per month over past year

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year