A case study on public inquiry engagement with vulnerable witnesses and on putting participants at the heart of the public inquiry process: insights from the Muckamore Abbey Hospital Inquiry

Tools

Ireton, E. ORCID: 0000-0003-4106-1697 and Ratcliffe, C. ORCID: 0009-0007-1603-102X, 2024. A case study on public inquiry engagement with vulnerable witnesses and on putting participants at the heart of the public inquiry process: insights from the Muckamore Abbey Hospital Inquiry. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 75 (AD1), pp. 35-66. ISSN 0029-3105

Text
2289235_Ireton.pdf - Published version
Full-text access embargoed until 1 November 2025.
Download (546kB)

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v75iad1.1154

Abstract

This case study examines Muckamore Abbey Hospital Inquiry’s approach to engaging with vulnerable witnesses and participants, including those with severe learning disabilities, developmental disabilities, and mental health needs. It offers detailed insight into the key considerations, adjustments made, and support provided by the Inquiry, and how it seeks to put the needs and interests of vulnerable participants at the heart of its process.

An inquiry chair has a very broad discretion to determine the procedure and conduct of a public inquiry. As a result, a public inquiry is uniquely placed to explore and adopt bespoke and novel approaches to challenges encountered, including addressing the needs of vulnerable participants. Lessons may be learnt to improve future inquiry practice, and comparative lessons may be learnt to inform other accountability processes, such as the criminal and civil justice systems and tribunals. However, currently, there is no central system that records and disseminates details of individual public inquiries’ procedure and conduct.

This case study examines the Inquiry’s adjustments and support measures, including: its treatment of all witnesses and participants as being potentially vulnerable, its innovative approach to the use of registered intermediaries and communication support in an inquiry context, and its flexible and responsive approach to individual participants’ needs. This research is designed to provide an evidence base to inform future inquiry teams in their procedural decision making, in the UK and other jurisdictions that adopt a similar inquiry model, and to inform future research on comparative lessons for other judicial and quasi-judicial processes.

Item Type:

Journal article

Publication Title:

Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly

Creators:

Ireton, E. and Ratcliffe, C.

Publisher:

School of Law, Queen's University Belfast

Date:

1 November 2024

Volume:

Number: