Developing and validating the ambivalent prejudice towards gay men scale (APGS): initial evidence of hostile and benevolent prejudice towards gay men in the United Kingdom

Brooks, AS, Zawisza, M and McDermott, DT ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7005-6446, 2026. Developing and validating the ambivalent prejudice towards gay men scale (APGS): initial evidence of hostile and benevolent prejudice towards gay men in the United Kingdom. Psychology and Sexuality. ISSN 1941-9899

[thumbnail of 2605463_McDermott.pdf] Text
2605463_McDermott.pdf - Post-print
Full-text access embargoed until 12 April 2027.

Download (759kB)

Abstract

This paper describes the development and initial validation of the ambivalent prejudice towards gay men scale (APGS) – a multidimensional 19-item measure of hostile and benevolent prejudice towards gay men – in two British samples. In Study 1 (N = 801), exploratory factor analysis produced a four-factor (repellent, romanticised, paternalistic, and adversarial) scale, with men scoring higher in repellent and adversarial prejudice and women scoring higher on romanticised prejudice, supporting known-groups validity. The APGS further evidenced convergent and discriminant validity relative to hostile and benevolent prejudice measures and ideologies associated with prejudice, and good internal and test-retest reliability. Romanticised (benevolent) and adversarial (hostile) subscales were positively correlated, and used to create an individual differences index of ambivalent prejudice towards gay men associated with system justifying beliefs and insensitive to self-presentational concerns. In Study 2 (N = 300), confirmatory factor analysis showed that the four-factor model demonstrated superior fit compared to alternative one-factor (generalised ambivalence) and two-factor (hostility and benevolence) models after minor re-specifications to parameters. The four-factor model demonstrated full scalar invariance between men and women and between data collected in 2016 and 2023, suggesting superior psychometric properties compared to currently available alternatives. Implications and directions for prejudice, intergroup relations, and scale validation research are presented.

Item Type: Journal article
Publication Title: Psychology and Sexuality
Creators: Brooks, A.S., Zawisza, M. and McDermott, D.T.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 12 April 2026
ISSN: 1941-9899
Identifiers:
Number
Type
10.1080/19419899.2026.2655664
DOI
2605463
Other
Rights: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Psychology & Sexuality on 12 Apr 2026, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2026.2655664
Divisions: Schools > School of Social Sciences
Record created by: Melissa Cornwell
Date Added: 13 Apr 2026 10:28
Last Modified: 13 Apr 2026 10:28
URI: https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/55542

Actions (login required)

Edit View Edit View

Statistics

Views

Views per month over past year

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year