Review of movement sensor applications in livestock animal activity recognition: communications, data collection practices, and edge-AI solutions

Patrick, B ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9115-1036, Kanjo, E ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1720-0661 and Kaiwartya, O ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9669-8244, 2026. Review of movement sensor applications in livestock animal activity recognition: communications, data collection practices, and edge-AI solutions. Smart Agricultural Technology, 14: 101986. ISSN 2772-3755

[thumbnail of 2606097_Patrick.pdf]
Preview
Text
2606097_Patrick.pdf - Published version

Download (7MB) | Preview

Abstract

Animal Activity Recognition (AAR) is a key component of Precision Livestock Farming (PLF), enabling continuous monitoring of animal behaviour, health, and welfare. Advances in machine learning (ML) and sensor technologies have significantly improved AAR accuracy; however, most systems depend on cloud-based architectures, which are impractical in rural settings due to limited connectivity and latency constraints. Edge Artificial Intelligence (Edge-AI) offers a promising alternative by enabling local on-device inference that improves responsiveness, reliability, and autonomy. This systematic review analyses 118 peer-reviewed studies published between 2018 and 2025, examining four critical components of the AAR pipeline: communication technologies, data acquisition methodologies, ML and deep learning (DL) model development, and Edge-AI implementation. We summarise approaches to data collection across livestock species, sensor placements, sampling frequencies, labelling strategies, environments, total animals, and total samples. Furthermore, we categorise and evaluate the ML algorithms used in AAR, discussing feature engineering, windowing strategies, and validation techniques. Our findings reveal that only a limited number of studies have explored Edge-AI in real-world deployments, underscoring challenges related to model compression, resource-constrained inference, and energy efficiency. To address these gaps, we synthesise deployment strategies that include TinyML frameworks and hardware-aware model optimisation. Compared with previous surveys, this review uniquely integrates the entire AAR development cycle, from data collection and model training to real-world deployment, providing a comprehensive reference for developing scalable, on-device livestock monitoring systems.

Item Type: Journal article
Publication Title: Smart Agricultural Technology
Creators: Patrick, B., Kanjo, E. and Kaiwartya, O.
Publisher: Elsevier
Date: August 2026
Volume: 14
ISSN: 2772-3755
Identifiers:
Number
Type
10.1016/j.atech.2026.101986
DOI
S2772375526002091
Publisher Item Identifier
2606097
Other
Rights: © 2026 the author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Divisions: Schools > School of Science and Technology
Record created by: Jonathan Gallacher
Date Added: 13 Apr 2026 15:53
Last Modified: 13 Apr 2026 15:53
URI: https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/55546

Actions (login required)

Edit View Edit View

Statistics

Views

Views per month over past year

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year