Coen, M and Doak, J ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3793-2819, 2017. Embedding explained jury verdicts in the English criminal trial. Legal Studies, 37 (4), pp. 786-806. ISSN 0261-3875
Preview |
Text
8880_Doak.pdf - Post-print Download (261kB) | Preview |
Abstract
English juries do not provide reasons for their verdicts. This paper argues that transparency is a fundamental value in modern decision making, and that reform is needed to trial by jury so that verdicts are routinely accompanied by explanations. It examines the options that exist to incorporate explained verdicts in the English criminal trial and concludes that accountability and legitimacy would be enhanced through the use of a trained, independent lay facilitator to chair the deliberation process and draft an explained verdict.
Item Type: | Journal article |
---|---|
Publication Title: | Legal Studies |
Creators: | Coen, M. and Doak, J. |
Publisher: | Wiley-Blackwell |
Date: | December 2017 |
Volume: | 37 |
Number: | 4 |
ISSN: | 0261-3875 |
Identifiers: | Number Type 10.1111/lest.12174 DOI |
Rights: | © 2017 The Society of Legal Scholars |
Divisions: | Schools > Nottingham Law School |
Record created by: | Jonathan Gallacher |
Date Added: | 31 Jul 2017 08:13 |
Last Modified: | 04 Mar 2020 12:43 |
URI: | https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/31326 |
Actions (login required)
Edit View |
Statistics
Views
Views per month over past year
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year