Fluctuation scaling, the calibration of dispersion, and the detection of differences

Holland, R, Rebmann, R, Williams, CD and Hanley, QS ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8189-9550, 2017. Fluctuation scaling, the calibration of dispersion, and the detection of differences. Analytical Chemistry. ISSN 0003-2700

Preview

Text 9285_Hanley.pdf - Post-print Download (665kB) | Preview

Abstract

Fluctuation scaling describes the relationship between the mean and standard deviation of a set of measurements. An example is Horwitz scaling which has been reported from inter-laboratory studies. Horwitz and similar studies have reported simple exponential and segmented scaling laws with exponents (α) typically between 0.85 (Horwitz) and 1 when not operating near a detection limit. When approaching a detection limit the exponents change and approach an apparently Gaussian (α = 0) model. This behavior is generally presented as a property of inter-laboratory studies which makes controlled replication to understand the behavior costly to perform. To assess the contribution of instrumentation to larger scale fluctuation scaling, we measured the behavior of two inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) systems, in two laboratories measuring thulium using 2 emission lines. The standard deviation universally increased with the uncalibrated signal indicating the system was heteroscedastic. The response from all lines and both instruments was consistent with a single exponential dispersion model having parameters α = 1.09 and β = 0.0035. No evidence of Horwitz scaling was found and there was no evidence of Poisson noise limiting behavior. The “Gaussian” component was a consequence of background subtraction for all lines and both instruments. The observation of a simple exponential dispersion model in the data allows for the definition of a difference detection limit (DDL) with universal applicability to systems following known dispersion. The DDL is the minimum separation between two points along a dispersion model required to claim they are different according to a particular statistical test. The DDL scales transparently with the mean and works at any location in a response function.

Item Type:	Journal article
Publication Title:	Analytical Chemistry
Creators:	Holland, R., Rebmann, R., Williams, C.D. and Hanley, Q.S.
Publisher:	American Chemical Society
Date:	11 October 2017
ISSN:	0003-2700
Identifiers:	Number Type 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02909 DOI
Divisions:	Schools > School of Science and Technology
Record created by:	Jonathan Gallacher
Date Added:	16 Oct 2017 09:28
Last Modified:	11 Oct 2018 03:00
URI:	https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/31819

Actions (login required)

Edit View

Statistics

Views

Downloads