Reported livestock guarding dog-wildlife interactions: implications for conservation and animal welfare

Whitehouse-Tedd, K ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0061-489X, Wilkes, R, Stannard, C, Wettlaufer, D and Cilliers, D, 2020. Reported livestock guarding dog-wildlife interactions: implications for conservation and animal welfare. Biological Conservation, 241: 108249. ISSN 0006-3207

Preview

Text 14806_Whitehouse-Tedd.pdf - Post-print Download (463kB) | Preview

Abstract

Livestock depredation by carnivores is a key cause of human-wildlife conflict around the world. Recently, the use of livestock-guarding dogs (LGDs) to reduce livestock depredation has been challenged in terms of their impact on wild animal welfare and survival, but the prevalence of LGD-wildlife interactions is poorly understood. Using data for 225 LGDs on South African farms, we determined the prevalence of farmer-reported LGD-wildlife interactions to contextualise the potential concerns. Wildlife interactions were reported for a total of 71 dogs (32%); McNemar’s tests revealed non-lethal herbivore interactions (8%) were significantly lower than non-lethal predator interactions (17%; p < 0.01), but no significant difference was detectable in the proportion of lethal interactions according to type of wildlife (9% for herbivores and 10% for predators). All reported predator interactions were defensive, compared to only 25% of reported herbivore interactions (p = 0.016). Of the dogs for which data on corrective measures were available, 44% were successfully corrected following intervention. Of the remainder, 42% had ceased exhibiting this behaviour independently or were acting defensively, 21% were removed from the programme, and 11% had died. Reported interactions with predators were rare, entirely defensive, and predominantly non-lethal. However, interactions with non-target species (herbivores) were more prevalent, necessitating remedial interventions. Overall, the conservation benefit of LGDs does not appear to be outweighed by ethical implications of their use; LGDs were shown to be highly targeted and discriminatory towards predators attempting to predate on livestock.

Item Type:	Journal article
Alternative Title:	Livestock guarding dog behavioural interactions with wildlife: implications for conservation and animal welfare
Publication Title:	Biological Conservation
Creators:	Whitehouse-Tedd, K., Wilkes, R., Stannard, C., Wettlaufer, D. and Cilliers, D.
Publisher:	Elsevier
Date:	January 2020
Volume:	241
ISSN:	0006-3207
Identifiers:	Number Type 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108249 DOI S0006320719304446 Publisher Item Identifier 1117992 Other
Divisions:	Schools > School of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences
Record created by:	Linda Sullivan
Date Added:	11 Sep 2019 15:44
Last Modified:	31 May 2021 15:13
URI:	https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/37642

Actions (login required)

Edit View

Statistics

Views

Downloads