A ‘morning-after’ pill for HIV? Social representations of post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV in the British print media

Jaspal, R ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8463-9519 and Nerlich, B, 2016. A ‘morning-after’ pill for HIV? Social representations of post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV in the British print media. Health, Risk & Society, 18 (5-6), pp. 225-246. ISSN 1369-8575

Preview

Text 1314943_Jaspal.pdf - Post-print Download (271kB) | Preview

Abstract

Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is a biomedical approach to HIV prevention that is administered after a potential exposure to the virus. Although it was originally approved in the UK for occupational exposure to HIV among healthcare workers, PEP has remained a controversial method of preventing HIV infection following sexual exposure. To examine emerging social representations of PEP, we undertook a qualitative thematic analysis of 72 articles published in UK newspapers between 1997 and 2015. We focused on print media, as they still reflect broader societal debates, set the agenda for wider discussions in other media and contribute to shaping public perceptions and policy priorities. Our findings show that there were two major social representations of the use of PEP for HIV prevention amongst gay and bisexual men: a positive social representation of PEP as a relatively straightforward solution, where PEP is metaphorically framed as the ‘morning-after pill’, and a more negative social representation of PEP as posing risks and yielding uncertain outcomes. We also found a third social representation for the use of PEP amongst public health care workers, where PEP is represented as needed and deserved. The positive representation generally consisted of anecdotal statements, while the negative representation was substantiated by ‘expert’ and layperson voices, rendering the latter more akin to a hegemonic representation of PEP. We generally found a lack of technical information in all newspapers, and an information gap that might inhibit informed discussion and lead to entrenching polarised social representations and to the stigmatisation of some users of PEP.

Item Type:	Journal article
Publication Title:	Health, Risk & Society
Creators:	Jaspal, R. and Nerlich, B.
Publisher:	Routledge
Date:	17 August 2016
Volume:	18
Number:	5-6
ISSN:	1369-8575
Identifiers:	Number Type 10.1080/13698575.2016.1222354 DOI 1314943 Other
Divisions:	Schools > School of Social Sciences
Record created by:	Jonathan Gallacher
Date Added:	15 Apr 2020 10:52
Last Modified:	15 Apr 2020 10:52
URI:	https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/39622

Actions (login required)

Edit View

Statistics

Views

Downloads