Scaring the public: fear appeal arguments in public health reasoning

Cummings, L, 2012. Scaring the public: fear appeal arguments in public health reasoning. Informal Logic, 32 (1), pp. 25-50. ISSN 0824-2577

Preview

Text 205828_7984 Cummings Publisher.pdf Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

The study of threat and fear appeal arguments has given rise to a sizeable literature. Even within a public health context, much is now known about how these arguments work to gain the public's compliance with health recommendations. Notwithstanding this level of interest in, and examination of, these arguments, there is one aspect of these arguments that still remains unexplored. That aspect concerns the heuristic function of these arguments within our thinking about public health problems. Specifically, it is argued that threat and fear appeal arguments serve as valuable shortcuts in our reasoning, particularly when that reasoning is subject to biases that are likely to diminish the effectiveness of public health messages. To this extent, they are rationally warranted argument forms rather than fallacies, as has been their dominant characterization in logic.

Item Type:	Journal article
Publication Title:	Informal Logic
Creators:	Cummings, L.
Publisher:	University of Windsor
Date:	2012
Volume:	32
Number:	1
ISSN:	0824-2577
Divisions:	Schools > School of Arts and Humanities
Record created by:	EPrints Services
Date Added:	09 Oct 2015 09:52
Last Modified:	12 Oct 2015 12:35
URI:	https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/4103

Actions (login required)

Edit View

Statistics

Views

Downloads