Limit-setting in gambling: some further thoughts and observations on Delfabbro and King (2021)

Griffiths, MD ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8880-6524 and Auer, M, 2022. Limit-setting in gambling: some further thoughts and observations on Delfabbro and King (2021). International Gambling Studies, 22 (3), pp. 337-343. ISSN 1445-9795

[thumbnail of 1524718_Griffiths.pdf]
Preview
Text
1524718_Griffiths.pdf - Post-print

Download (718kB) | Preview

Abstract

A recent review by Delfabbro and King (2021) published in International Gambling Studies examined the efficacy of voluntary versus mandatory limit-setting in gambling. The review examined 25 empirical studies (18 on voluntary limit-setting and seven on mandatory limit-setting). In this short commentary, we outline a few other thoughts and observations as a supplement to their review. Of the 25 studies reviewed, only ten were published in peer reviewed journals and given the high reliance on studies in the grey literature, there were other studies that could have been included. There were also other studies not meeting Delfabbro and King’s inclusion criterion that could have provided some further useful data.

Item Type: Journal article
Publication Title: International Gambling Studies
Creators: Griffiths, M.D. and Auer, M.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 10 March 2022
Volume: 22
Number: 3
ISSN: 1445-9795
Identifiers:
Number
Type
10.1080/14459795.2021.2009003
DOI
1524718
Other
Rights: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Gambling Studies on 10 March 2022, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14459795.2021.2009003
Divisions: Schools > School of Social Sciences
Record created by: Laura Ward
Date Added: 14 Mar 2022 09:25
Last Modified: 10 Mar 2023 03:00
URI: https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/45868

Actions (login required)

Edit View Edit View

Statistics

Views

Views per month over past year

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year