Does audio-visual information result in improved health-related decision-making compared with audio-only or visual-only information? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Stacey, JE ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4035-712X, Atkin, C, Henshaw, H, Roberts, KL ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8735-2249, Allen, HA, Justice, LV ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3394-2283 and Badham, SP ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6890-102X, 2022. Does audio-visual information result in improved health-related decision-making compared with audio-only or visual-only information? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 12 (4): e059599. ISSN 2044-6055

[thumbnail of 1542672_Stacey.pdf]
Preview
Text
1542672_Stacey.pdf - Published version

Download (342kB) | Preview

Abstract

Introduction: Making health-related decisions can be difficult due to the amount and complexity of information available. Audio-visual information may improve memory for health information but whether audio-visual information can enhance health-related decisions has not been explored using quantitative methods. The objective of this systematic review is to understand how effective audio-visual information is for informing health-related decision-making compared with audio-only or visual-only information.

Methods and analysis: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) will be included if they include audio-visual and either audio-only or visual-only information provision and decision-making in a health setting. Studies will be excluded if they are not reported in English. Twelve databases will be searched including: Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed and PsychINFO. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (V.7) will be used to assess risk of bias in included RCTs. Results will be synthesised primarily using a meta-analysis; where quantitative data are not reported, a narrative synthesis will be used.

Ethics and dissemination: No ethical issues are foreseen. Data will be disseminated via academic publication and conference presentations. Findings may also be published in scientific newsletters and magazines. This review is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council.

Item Type: Journal article
Publication Title: BMJ Open
Creators: Stacey, J.E., Atkin, C., Henshaw, H., Roberts, K.L., Allen, H.A., Justice, L.V. and Badham, S.P.
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Date: 29 April 2022
Volume: 12
Number: 4
ISSN: 2044-6055
Identifiers:
Number
Type
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059599
DOI
1542672
Other
Rights: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Divisions: Schools > School of Social Sciences
Record created by: Laura Ward
Date Added: 03 May 2022 14:44
Last Modified: 03 May 2022 14:44
Related URLs:
URI: https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/46239

Actions (login required)

Edit View Edit View

Statistics

Views

Views per month over past year

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year