Tools
Tools
Chen, I.-H., Huang, P.-C., Lin, Y.-C., Gan, W.Y., Fan, C.-W., Yang, W.-C., Tung, S.E.H., Poon, W.C., Griffiths, M.D. 
ORCID: 0000-0001-8880-6524 and Lin, C.-Y.,
2022.
The Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 and the modified Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 in Taiwan: factor structure and concurrent validity.
Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13: 1014447.
|
Text
1624308_Griffiths.pdf - Published version Download (5MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Introduction: The most widely used instruments to assess food addiction – the Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 (YFAS 2.0) and its modified version (mYFAS 2.0) – have not been validated in a Taiwanese population. The present study compared the psychometric properties between the Taiwan versions of YFAS 2.0 and mYFAS 2.0 among university students.
Methods: An online survey comprising the YFAS 2.0, mYFAS 2.0, Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ) and International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF) were used to assess food addiction, self-stigma, and physical activity.
Results: All participants (n = 687; mean age = 24.00 years [SD ± 4.48 years]; 407 females [59.2%]) completed the entire survey at baseline and then completed the YFAS 2.0 and mYFAS 2.0 again three months later. The results of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the YFAS 2.0 and mYFAS 2.0 both shared a similar single-factor solution. In addition, both the YFAS 2.0 and mYFAS 2.0 reported good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.90 and 0.89), good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.71 and 0.69), and good concurrent validity with the total scores being strongly associated with the WSSQ (r = 0.54 and 0.57; p < 0.01), and less strongly associated with BMI (r = 0.17 and 0.13; p < 0.01) and IPAQ-SF (r = 0.23 and 0.25; p < 0.01).
Discussion: Based on the findings, the Taiwan versions of the YFAS 2.0 and mYFAS 2.0 appear to be valid and reliable instruments assessing food addiction.
| Item Type: | Journal article | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Publication Title: | Frontiers in Psychiatry | ||||||
| Creators: | Chen, I.-H., Huang, P.-C., Lin, Y.-C., Gan, W.Y., Fan, C.-W., Yang, W.-C., Tung, S.E.H., Poon, W.C., Griffiths, M.D. and Lin, C.-Y. | ||||||
| Publisher: | Frontiers Media SA | ||||||
| Date: | 25 November 2022 | ||||||
| Volume: | 13 | ||||||
| Identifiers: |
|
||||||
| Rights: | © 2022 Chen, Huang, Lin, Gan, Fan, Yang, Tung, Poon, Griffiths and Lin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. | ||||||
| Divisions: | Schools > School of Social Sciences | ||||||
| Record created by: | Linda Sullivan | ||||||
| Date Added: | 01 Dec 2022 10:05 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 01 Dec 2022 10:05 | ||||||
| URI: | https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/47562 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit View |
Views
Views per month over past year
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
