Performance of ethnic minority versus White doctors in the MRCGP assessment 2016–2021: a cross-sectional study

Siriwardena, AN, Botan, V ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1583-3913, Williams, N, Emerson, K, Kameen, F, Pope, L, Freeman, A and Law, G, 2023. Performance of ethnic minority versus White doctors in the MRCGP assessment 2016–2021: a cross-sectional study. British Journal of General Practice, 73 (729), e284-e293. ISSN 0960-1643

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background: Differential attainment has previously been suggested as being due to subjective bias because of racial discrimination in clinical skills assessments.

Aim: To investigate differential attainment in all UK general practice licensing tests comparing ethnic minority with White doctors.

Design and setting: Observational study of doctors in GP specialty training in the UK.

Method: Data were analysed from doctors’ selection in 2016 to the end of GP training, linking selection, licensing, and demographic data to develop multivariable logistic regression models. Predictors of pass rates were identified for each assessment.

Results: A total of 3429 doctors entering GP specialty training in 2016 were included, with doctors of different sex (female 63.81% versus male 36.19%), ethnic group (White British 53.95%, minority ethnic 43.04%, and mixed 3.01%), country of primary medical qualification (UK 76.76% versus non-UK 23.24%), and declared disability (disability declared 11.98% versus not declared 88.02%). Multi-Specialty Recruitment Assessment (MSRA) scores were highly predictive for GP training end-point assessments, including the Applied Knowledge Test (AKT), Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA), Recorded Consultation Assessment (RCA), and Workplace-Based Assessment (WPBA) and Annual Review of Competency Progression (ARCP). Ethnic minority doctors did significantly better compared with White British doctors in the AKT (odds ratio [OR] 2.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03 to 4.10, P = 0.042). There were no significant differences on other assessments: CSA (OR 0.72, 95% CI = 0.43 to 1.20, P = 0.201), RCA (OR 0.48, 95% CI = 0.18 to 1.32, P = 0.156), or WPBA—ARCP (OR 0.70, 95% CI = 0.49 to 1.01, P = 0.057).

Conclusion: Ethnic background did not reduce the chance of passing GP licensing tests once sex, place of primary medical qualification, declared disability, and MSRA scores were accounted for.

Item Type:	Journal article
Publication Title:	British Journal of General Practice
Creators:	Siriwardena, A.N., Botan, V., Williams, N., Emerson, K., Kameen, F., Pope, L., Freeman, A. and Law, G.
Publisher:	Royal College of General Practitioners
Date:	2023
Volume:	73
Number:	729
ISSN:	0960-1643
Identifiers:	Number Type 10.3399/bjgp.2022.0474 DOI 1769855 Other
Rights:	This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/).
Divisions:	Schools > School of Social Sciences
Record created by:	Jonathan Gallacher
Date Added:	12 Jun 2023 15:20
Last Modified:	12 Jun 2023 15:21
URI:	https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/49185

Actions (login required)

Edit View

Statistics

Views

Downloads