Social responsibility in micro businesses in an African context: towards a theoretical understanding

Uba, CD, Hasan, MN ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9307-1769 and Mshelia, JB, 2023. Social responsibility in micro businesses in an African context: towards a theoretical understanding. Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility, 32 (1), pp. 164-178. ISSN 2694-6424

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Small businesses often engage in social responsibility (SR) without knowing it or without referring to their actions as SR. This is particularly the case in developing countries where the idea of SR is seen as synonymous with philanthropy. While the literature on small business social responsibility is growing, our understanding of the context-specific determinants of responsible practices in microbusinesses (those that employ less than 10 employees) that dominate the business landscape in many developing countries is still limited. In this paper, we address this gap and offer a theoretical understanding of how microbusiness owner-managers understand and approach SR by drawing on rich qualitative data collected from Nigeria—Africa's largest economy. We utilise Social Representations Theory to understand (1) how and why microbusiness owner-managers limit their understanding of SR to philanthropic activities and (2) the wide range of practices, including philanthropic activities, that account for their overall Responsible Business Practices (RBPs)—those practices that enable them to act responsibly towards their stakeholders and/or operating environments. We find that owner-managers' representations of SR are anchored primarily on an idiosyncratic ethical tendency and inclination towards the creation of social/communal harmony by ‘giving back to society’ and objectified via actions deriving from three ‘giving back’ orientations, namely Core Philanthropism, Social Problem Solving, and Empowering. We model microbusiness owner-managers' RBPs, highlighting the intersectional interplay of the voluntary (SR as philanthropy) and non-voluntary (self-regulatory and legal) dimensions of RBPs. Finally, we discuss the key findings in relation to the extant literature and to policymakers and managers.

Item Type: Journal article
Publication Title: Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility
Creators: Uba, C.D., Hasan, M.N. and Mshelia, J.B.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: January 2023
Volume: 32
Number: 1
ISSN: 2694-6424
Identifiers:
Number
Type
10.1111/beer.12476
DOI
2218137
Other
Rights: © 2022 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Divisions: Schools > Nottingham Business School
Record created by: Jeremy Silvester
Date Added: 18 Sep 2024 09:00
Last Modified: 18 Sep 2024 09:00
URI: https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/52247

Actions (login required)

Edit View Edit View

Statistics

Views

Views per month over past year

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year