The future of geography field course pedagogy in UK Higher Education author affiliations

Woodley, E, Barr, S, Batty, L, Bickerstaff, K, Ferdous, R ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5319-9007, Darvill, C, Yorke, L, Holmes, N, Jon, I, Lynch, K, Martin, J, Marvell, A, Mcdougall, D and Pitt, H, 2024. The future of geography field course pedagogy in UK Higher Education author affiliations. Geo: Geography and Environment, 11 (2): e00158. ISSN 2054-4049

Preview

Text 2275978_Ferdous.pdf - Post-print Download (452kB) | Preview

Abstract

Field courses are widely regarded as integral to geography degree programmes, providing students with opportunities for experiential learning, often in unfamiliar international environments. Yet, this key area of pedagogy appears increasingly unsustainable and complex for Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) within the context of the urgent need for decarbonisation, increasing financial costs, and the institutional challenges of comprehensively embedding necessary Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) considerations into these activities. Here, we report on a national-level workshop (April 2024) that brought together a wide range of HE practitioners to discuss the future of UK field course pedagogy, using the fieldwork principles adopted by the Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers) (RGS-IBG) in 2020 as a basis for framing future discourse. Using a Three Horizons approach to guide our conversations, we critically explored the (un)sustainability of current academic and institutional practices, alongside future directions and ‘disrupting’ (innovative) practices for promoting transformative change in this area of education. Here, we argue for two sector-wide discussions that require collaborative engagement with practitioners, institutions, and students. Firstly, we highlight the urgent need for transparent and critical reflection on the challenges and hypocrisy of aeromobility in academia and the need for more widespread adoption of low carbon (‘slower’) modes of travel. Secondly, we call for the immediate reconceptualization of field course pedagogy to place EDI considerations at the core of field course design and practice, aiding a transition towards Universal Design for Learning (UDL). As such, we call on the geography community in higher education to engage in critical reflection on how we take meaningful and urgent action to address the disconnect between our stated educational values around environmental sustainability and EDI, and our actual educational practices.

Item Type:	Journal article
Publication Title:	Geo: Geography and Environment
Creators:	Woodley, E., Barr, S., Batty, L., Bickerstaff, K., Ferdous, R., Darvill, C., Yorke, L., Holmes, N., Jon, I., Lynch, K., Martin, J., Marvell, A., Mcdougall, D. and Pitt, H.
Publisher:	Wiley Open Access
Date:	2024
Volume:	11
Number:	2
ISSN:	2054-4049
Identifiers:	Number Type 10.1002/geo2.158 DOI 2275978 Other
Divisions:	Schools > School of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences
Record created by:	Jeremy Silvester
Date Added:	06 Nov 2024 10:07
Last Modified:	13 Dec 2024 16:57
URI:	https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/52507

Actions (login required)

Edit View

Statistics

Views

Downloads