Under pressure: macroinvertebrate community responses to agriculture in temporary streams

Tools

Gething, KJ ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4997-0249, Sarremejane, R ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4943-1173, House, A, England, J, Sykes, T and Stubbington, R ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8475-5109, 2025. Under pressure: macroinvertebrate community responses to agriculture in temporary streams. Freshwater Biology, 70 (5): e70049. ISSN 0046-5070

Preview

Text
2445848_Gething.pdf - Published version
Download (1MB) | Preview

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.70049

Abstract

1. Temporary streams dominate global river networks and thus often occur in catchments dominated by agricultural land uses. Drying and agriculture can exert similar stressors on aquatic communities, for example, by decreasing dissolved oxygen concentrations and increasing fine sediment deposition. However, little is known about the effects of agriculture in driving taxonomic and trait variability in temporary stream communities. Therefore, we compared the effects of agricultural land use on variability in taxonomic and functional macroinvertebrate communities in temporary and perennial streams.

2. We used 98 macroinvertebrate samples collected from sites with perennial (n = 49) and temporary (n = 49) flow in southern England. We quantified the spatial extent of agriculture surrounding each site, assigned samples to high (n = 62) and low (n = 36) agricultural land use categories, and tested whether variability in community composition differed between perennial and temporary reaches and between high and low agricultural categories. We also tested whether the occurrence of temporary stream specialist species was influenced by agriculture.

3. Regardless of agricultural land use, temporary reach communities were more variable than those in perennial reaches, suggesting that drying is a bigger influence than agriculture on stream communities. Within temporary reaches, communities were comparably variable regardless of agriculture, whereas agriculture increased variability among perennial reach communities. The occurrence of temporary stream specialists was unaffected by agriculture.

4. Our results suggest that tolerance of drying by temporary stream communities confers tolerance of agriculture. This co-tolerance of drying and agriculture may occur because temporary stream communities typically comprise species that experience agriculture and drying as comparable pressures. These species include temporary stream specialists that tolerate a wide range of environmental conditions, including drying.

5. Although temporary stream communities and their specialist species may be co-tolerant of drying and agriculture, these and other human pressures are intensifying, with potentially detrimental impacts on their long-term stability.

Item Type:	Journal article
Publication Title:	Freshwater Biology
Creators:	Gething, K.J., Sarremejane, R., House, A., England, J., Sykes, T. and Stubbington, R.
Publisher:	Wiley
Date:	26 May 2025
Volume:	70
Number:	5
ISSN:	0046-5070
Identifiers:	Number Type 10.1111/fwb.70049 DOI 2445848 Other
Rights:	© 2025 the author(s). Freshwater Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Divisions:	Schools > School of Science and Technology
Record created by:	Jonathan Gallacher
Date Added:	10 Jun 2025 14:08
Last Modified:	10 Jun 2025 14:08
URI:	https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/53720