Adapting hazard perception testing to the Czech driving context: a comparison of hazard perception paradigms in differentiating driver experience and collision history

Ventsislavova, P ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7095-8113, Sucha, M, Harrison, L, Novotny, J and Crundall, D ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6030-3631, 2026. Adapting hazard perception testing to the Czech driving context: a comparison of hazard perception paradigms in differentiating driver experience and collision history. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 232: 108538. ISSN 0001-4575

[thumbnail of 2603663_Ventsislavova.pdf]
Preview
Text
2603663_Ventsislavova.pdf - Published version

Download (5MB) | Preview

Abstract

Hazard perception (HP) testing is widely regarded as an effective approach for identifying unsafe drivers and mitigating collision risk. The European Transport Safety Council has therefore recommended its adoption within national licensing systems. Evidence indicates that HP assessments must be adapted to local environments to yield comparable safety benefits. Moreover, traditional HP tests depend largely on reaction times, which may introduce post-perceptual biases because responses typically reflect the moment a hazard is judged as threatening. To address this, the present study developed two versions of the HP test tailored to the Czech driving context: a conventional reaction-time-based test and a prediction-based test in which participants were asked to anticipate how a hazardous situation would unfold. Hazardous traffic scenarios were filmed across the Czech Republic and edited into hazard perception and prediction tests. A total of 225 participants were recruited and randomly allocated to either the hazard perception or hazard prediction test. Within each test, participants were grouped according to pre-existing driving experience (novice vs. experienced) and collision history (collision-free vs. collision-involved). The results indicated that experienced drivers outperformed novices on both test versions, showing faster and more accurate hazard detection and superior predictive performance. These findings support the feasibility of incorporating a hybrid HP assessment into the Czech national licensing system. However, significant collision group differences emerged only in the perception task, with collision-involved drivers demonstrating slower hazard response times. This suggests that the key differences may arise from post-perceptual decision-making processes rather than perceptual limitations.

Item Type: Journal article
Publication Title: Accident Analysis and Prevention
Creators: Ventsislavova, P., Sucha, M., Harrison, L., Novotny, J. and Crundall, D.
Publisher: Elsevier
Date: July 2026
Volume: 232
ISSN: 0001-4575
Identifiers:
Number
Type
10.1016/j.aap.2026.108538
DOI
S0001457526001478
Publisher Item Identifier
2603663
Other
Rights: © 2026 the author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Divisions: Schools > School of Social Sciences
Record created by: Jonathan Gallacher
Date Added: 08 Apr 2026 15:16
Last Modified: 08 Apr 2026 16:24
URI: https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/55515

Actions (login required)

Edit View Edit View

Statistics

Views

Views per month over past year

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year