[Open peer commentary] Is this conjectural phenotypic dichotomy a plausible outcome of genomic imprinting?

Dickins, BJA ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0866-6232, Dickins, DW and Dickins, TE, 2008. [Open peer commentary] Is this conjectural phenotypic dichotomy a plausible outcome of genomic imprinting? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31 (03), pp. 267-268. ISSN 0140-525X

Preview

Text PubSub4375_Dickens.pdf - Post-print Download (133kB) | Preview

Abstract

What is the status of the dichotomy proposed and the nosological validity of the contrasting pathologies described in the target article? How plausibly can dysregulated imprinting explain the array of features described, compared with other genetic models? We believe that considering alternative models is more likely to lead in the long term to the correct classification and explanation of the component behaviours.

Item Type:	Journal article
Description:	Commentary on article 'Psychosis and autism as diametrical disorders of the social brain' by Crespi, B. and Badcock, C.
Publication Title:	Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Creators:	Dickins, B.J.A., Dickins, D.W. and Dickins, T.E.
Publisher:	Cambridge University Press
Place of Publication:	Cambridge
Date:	June 2008
Volume:	31
Number:	03
ISSN:	0140-525X
Identifiers:	Number Type 10.1017/S0140525X08004287 DOI
Divisions:	Schools > School of Science and Technology
Record created by:	EPrints Services
Date Added:	09 Oct 2015 10:02
Last Modified:	09 Jun 2017 13:17
URI:	https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/6686

Actions (login required)

Edit View

Statistics

Views

Downloads